Skip Nav

Same-Sex Marriage Research Paper

Where the Public Stands on Religious Liberty vs. Nondiscrimination

❶Gay marriage is [state your belief].

The legal definition of marriage: Why rely on the Bible?

“Liberty and justice for all?”
All Publications from this Topic
Same sex marriage research paper as the college thesis

People of faith are the biggest advocates against same-sex marriages. With the belief that marriage is the foundation for procreation, same-sex couples, without the ability to have their own child, should not be allowed the right of marriage. Seeing that there are many rights and responsibilities associated with marriage, same-sex couples are denied these and are being discriminated against. Although many states have adopted civil unions, they are separate and unequal.

Same-sex marriage should be legalized to create equality and eliminate the injustice involving same-sex couples. Marriage is a basic human right for every individual. Same sex marriage should be legalized in Illinois. History of same sex marriage. Same sex marriage in early years. First laws against same sex relationships. National awareness and rise of the Gay Movement. Religion and same sex marriage. Having children is main reason for marriage. Other alternatives for having children.

Marriage ceremonies involving the church. The church does not marry people. The church has blessed many other things that involve destruction. The bill could be crafted in a way so the church is not involved. Marriage would take place in a courtroom.

Marriage is a right every individual is entitled to. Social Security benefits upon death, disability or retirement of spouse, as well as benefits for minor children, workers' compensation protections for the family of a worker injured on the job, exemptions from estate taxes when a spouse dies, exemptions from federal income taxes on spouse's health insurance are all denied to same sex couples.

Ideal image of a family. Father and mother figure. Parents would still rather see their children find someone who loves them and be happy. Civil unions versus marriage. Civil unions are separate and unequal. Heterosexual people can be in a civil union but homosexual people cannot get married. There are no benefits associated with a civil union. Civil unions are not recognized state to state. The battle over same-sex marriage will be forever ongoing.

Same-sex marriage has been in history for decades. Design of the bill. Restate Main arguments as well as counterarguments. Legalizing same-sex marriage will create equality. In early times, same-sex marriage was not considered taboo and in many cultures, it was encouraged.

Random History explains that in the early civilizations of Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt, the union between couples of the same-sex was recognized by the kingdom. Same-sex marriages were often believed to be more pure than a heterosexual marriage.

Marriage was believed to be the union of two people based on love. A marriage consisting of two males or two females, if women had the right to get married, was not frowned upon. It was not until the rise of Christianity that a negative attitude towards same-sex marriage became introduced.

The belief that marriage was based on procreation and any relationship that was non-procreative began to increase in many societies. Japanese Buddhism records the most tolerant attitude toward homosexuality, praising it for its mystery. Today, there are no religious or political limitations on homosexual behavior in Japan. Sexuality is considered a private matter and lacks any restrictions. Other things, such as mixed race relationships were considered more offensive than homosexuality.

Random History also explains how in the thirteenth century, the first laws banning sodomy were introduced and were strictly enforced. Through the next centuries, homosexual behavior became deviant and was punished. Due to the belief that homosexual behavior was wrong, the belief that heterosexual relationships were normal became popular among the majority of countries.

By the nineteenth century, heterosexuality became the most believed standard for relationships. Although the debate for same-sex marriage became noticeably public in the late twentieth century, it was not until during a Hawaiian case, that the issue became national news. The ruling of the case stated that the restriction of marriage and its benefits to opposite-sex couples were unconstitutional.

By that same year, a majority of states passed laws prohibiting same-sex marriage. Since then, states have defined their own definition of marriage. Despite the fact that the debate over same-sex marriage is relatively new in the United States, five states have made same-sex marriage legal, as well as Washington D.

According to [cite expert or organization], [state claim]. Your second claim should use research, facts and reputable sources to prove your point and encourage people to see things your way.

Your third claim should also back up the thesis statement and needs to include sources. Including a quote from an expert will help reinforce your point of view. In fact, [state third claim]. As you can see, the evidence proves that [restate thesis]. Use citation generating tools, such as EasyBib. Example Opening Claims for Gay Marriage Banning gay marriage is discrimination and classification of human beings based on value.

According to the 14th Amendment in the US Constitution, all people are to be considered equal, which would also apply to marriage. Example Opening Claims Against Gay Marriage Traditionally, marriage is between a man and a woman and this should not be changed. Marriage is meant to be for procreation. As gay couples cannot physically reproduce, they have no reason to marry. First Claim Starting Sentence Option 1: Example Claims for Gay Marriage Banning gay marriage is discrimination and classification of human beings based on value.

Even in nature, we see animals and birds engaging in same sex activity, indicating that it is a natural part of life. If marriage were only for procreation, infertile couples or those choosing not to have children could not marry, either. The legalization of gay marriage does not in any way take away from traditional, heterosexual marriages. Gay marriage allows same-sex partners to have the same legal rights in hospital visits, inheritance and more, as their hetero counterparts.

Arguments Against Same Sex Marriages

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Legalizing same-sex marriage will create equality. Lauren Altergott. Ms. Woolley. The Injustice Involving Same-sex Marriage. In early times, same-sex marriage was not .

Privacy FAQs

For my research paper, I challenged myself to write it about why same-sex marriage should not be legalized. After three days of research, I regret to inform you that, with the information I found, there is no logical reason whatsoever that same-sex couples should not be able to get married/5(2).

About Our Ads

Points Research 3 Task B: The Annotated Bibliography 4 Putting the Pieces Together 11 The Overview 11 The Facts 11 The Final Conclusion 12 The Same-Sex Marriage Introduction and Background A marriage amongst two individuals of the same sex individuality and/or same genetic sex is known as gay marriage or same-sex marriage. The most fundamental issue when addressing same-sex marriage is the definition of marriage itself. A universally accepted definition has yet to be established because marriage is a delicate entanglement of personal intimacy and public declaration.4/5(12).

Cookie Info

May 21,  · Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage Thesis. The question regarding legalization of same-sex marriages relates to fundamental change of law not just nationally, but also internationally. Legalizing gay marriages is an important step towards the enforcement of the constitutional guarantee of equality of all before the law and equal protection of the law. marriage and in supporting the movement for same-sex marriage, but the institution of marriage would have undergone these changes regardless of any push for the acceptance of same-sex marriage. This paper will contend that acceptance of same-sex marriage will require changes in public attitudes.