Julia also did a big favor to a lot of environmentalists out there, because she showed other people that it is meaningful. Julia was successful in many levels. She was successful in not having the tree removed. She was also successful that she intrigued another activists to fight strongly for what they believe.
To all people there is a specific issue that triggers a fighter inside of them. There are many issues nowadays for particularly anything. When I searched the Internet for an issue that intrigues me, I found something that is not solved yet and I wanted to share my opinion about it.
The issue that I chose is Abortion Rights. It is about the limitation of having women to abort. A lot of people are fighting for women to have the freedom of having abortions and there are others who are fighting to end abortion. The key point of ending this issue is knowing when does the fetus come to life. People want to know when is the right time in having an abortion. As of now in the U. I am not in favor of abortion rights.
People tend to have an abortion because they are not ready to take care of the baby or it is not its time. There are many choices they could choose but abortion should not be one of them. There are a lot of people that want children in their lives. People who want to have an abortion should think of giving up the baby for adoption, foster care, and many organizations that could help the baby to a better life, not end it.
I agree that the person should have the right to have an abortion unless the fetus came to life. However, according to the article I read, you cannot know when is the fetus alive. Some people say that the fetus is alive from the moment of conception, some say when the fertilized egg is implanted in the womb, some say when he start to move, and it goes on from various of point of views.
The moral question on both sides of the abortion argument is when a fetus achieves personhood and is awarded moral status thus granting it rights.
How do we begin to answer this highly debated question and what conclusions can be made that have the most logical ethical answer? The difficulty in answering the issue of fetal personhood is that there is not one concrete indication of when that actually occurs in pregnancy.
Pro- Life supports the position that personhood occurs immediately at conception thus granting the fetus full rights as a person born. Should anyone or any entity force a person to give up their decision to do what they seem fit with their own body?
What precedents does that set forth for the future for women? The nature of abortion rights can be broken out into three different perspectives; the protection of unwanted social parenthood; the unwanted genetic parenthood and the right to bodily autonomy.
The burdens of social parenthood weigh heavily on the woman who is forced to endure a pregnancy. These burdens can be detrimental to mental and physical health and psychological harm is likely to damage the child that is brought into a situation not fully embracing or prepared to care for its needs. Through abortion, a woman has the right to prevent the existence of a child with her genetic characteristics. It is an essential part of her overall reproductive liberty to have either the right to or the right not to conceive children.
Manninen 37 However, once a child is born, then it becomes a moral subject with its full entitlement to personhood and you cannot kill a child with your genetic characteristics or to avoid the responsibility of social parenting. Are you morally obligated to submit to the unwanted bodily intrusion in order to support the life of another person?
The concept of forced violations of bodily autonomy is morally indefensible. This has nothing to do with the value of the fetus in general but the right not to be subject to the intrusion as the right to your body is exclusively yours. To make abortion illegal is to force pregnant women to surrender their own bodies to provide another human being all its needs for survival.
Manninen 40 The women essentially become hosts to the fetuses and are used to cultivate life. A blastocyst or a human zygote does not have the full characteristics of what human beings have. It cannot function on its own, communicate or have a consciousness attributed to it.
It merely possesses the potential to form into personhood and ultimately a human life. No actual person is harmed by having an abortion so there is no reason that the act in itself is morally bad. Pro Life gains its understanding through what is commonly known as the substance view. This means that human life is valued for the type of thing it is from the moment of conception to its ultimate demise. Human beings are considered rational moral agents that are consistent with its original substance but possess capabilities that give it the ability to function.
Since human beings are considered living organisms, as substances they maintain their identity throughout the process of their life regardless of the physical changes that occur. Thus human beings are always considered persons because of their potential to develop abilities.
In addition, humans are also considered persons even if the potential never actualizes because their overall substance. The substance theory extends not only to the unborn fetus, but to other humans who for whatever reason are prevented from exercising their capabilities as a functioning person.
These types of persons have similar parallels to the unborn because they have achieved personhood and full moral status simply because of being human. The rationale behind the substance theory is if it is permissible to kill the unborn fetus then it is equally permissible to kill a person unable to exercise their capabilities as a functioning person.
Thus abortion is morally wrong. Another argument in the abortion debate is the precise moment when personhood is achieved. The Pro-Life position stems from the moment of conception because the zygote contains all of the chromosomes for human life. Some of the chromosomes have not been used yet since human life is in its beginning stages and does not require all of them at this time. In addition to the scientific perspective to the pro-life position is the religious perspective that a higher power, God, created all life and humans do not have a right to take the power of God in their hands and destroy it.
People who have this theory base it off the teachings of Scripture contained within the Bible. An example passage is:. Psalm again makes clear that the fetus unborn baby is a human whom God loves. Therefore since the fetus is considered a person, abortion is considered murdering a person and is ultimately wrong in the eyes of God.
When it comes to the topic of Abortion, my views align with the moderate view. I neither condemn nor condone abortion but my belief aligns itself with the reasoning that a woman has a right to choose what happens in her own individual body.
No woman should be forced to surrender her body in order to provide another human being its needs to survive. Without this fundamental protection securely in place, it sets a dangerous precedent for the abuse of women. It can be argued that if a woman must give up her body to sustain the life of another when it comes to reproductive rights, what about the means of other bodily rights such as organ donation, bone marrow extraction and other harvesting means?
To reverse the pro-choice decision is reducing women from being independent beings to being merely hosts and have less rights then the potential for a human has.
In addition, no woman should be forced to continue with a pregnancy she does not want, can cause her medical harm, or is a result of a violent crime. The physical and psychological damage that can be inflicted from forcing women to continue with unwanted pregnancies is too horrible to consider. As a mother to three children, I certainly do know the varying physical changes as a result of pregnancy.
- The Abortion Debate in the Presidential Election Abortion is a major issue that affects individual lives daily. It has become a debatable factor in determining the solution in having the free choice for a woman to abort their unborn baby.
Abortion is a very controversial matter in our society. In the United States it is legal to abort a baby up until the day of birth. An abortion is the ending of pregnancy before birth which results in the death of an embryo or a fetus.
People who are in favor of abortion mainly argue about that people should have the choice of keeping the baby or not and people who are not in favor of abortion do not want to end a human being’s life. The key point of ending this issue is knowing when does the fetus come to life. People want to know when is the right time in having an abortion. Argumentative Essay on Abortion. The abortion debate is an ongoing controversy, continually dividing Americans along moral, legal and religious lines. Most people tend to assume one of two positions: “pro-life” (an embryo or fetus should be given the right to gestate to term and be born.
The Abortion Debate Essay Words | 7 Pages. No matter where you stand on the issue, abortion is a highly debated topic in today’s society. In this essay I will examine both sides of the abortion issue. I will begin with a brief overview of the abortion debate, to include the morality of the situation. Next I will discuss the Pro-Life argument. Is Abortion Wrong or is it Right? Essay - Abortion is defined as: "the termination of pregnancy and expulsion of an embryo or of a fetus that is incapable of survival." However, if only the debate over the abortion issue was .